The Indian government has proposed changes to extend its regulatory framework to a wider range of online news voices, including influencers and podcasters on platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, and X. Last week, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) suggested amendments to India's IT rules - which govern digital media content - to include 'users who are not publishers' who share content related to 'news and current affairs' within a 'code of ethics' it currently applies to registered news publishers.
Experts say this will potentially give the government more power over news-related posts shared by ordinary users, including independent journalists and podcasters. The government has proposed requiring social media platforms to follow orders and guidelines if they want to keep 'safe harbour' protection - legal immunity from liability for content posted by users.
The proposed amendments have alarmed digital rights activists and independent news creators, who say they could enforce near-total compliance with state-led censorship on social media platforms. They also warn the rules could be misused to target critics and clamp down on dissent.
The government says the amendments will strengthen existing IT rules and curb fake news, hate speech, and deepfakes, and has invited public feedback by 14 April. But critics remain sceptical of the government's stated intentions. Akash Banerjee, who runs the YouTube channel The Deshbhakt with more than six million subscribers, says the rules could create a climate of fear, pushing many creators toward self-censorship.
Interestingly, despite the many laws regulating online content, hate speech and fake news haven't reduced in the country. Meanwhile, posts that are critical of the government - even if they're satirical - are increasingly being blocked or removed, according to Banerjee.
But last month, X blocked about a dozen accounts, many known for satirical posts about the government, acting on orders issued under Section 69A of India's IT Act. Kumar Nayan, whose X account @Nehr_who? has about 242,000 followers, told the BBC he received neither prior notice nor an explanation for the block. He noted that while he managed to restore his account through a court order, several of his posts critical of the government were still blocked pending review.
Digital rights activist Nikhil Pahwa warns that the proposed amendments to the IT rules only enhance the government's infrastructure for mass censorship, reducing user rights further. The IT rules have previously been amended in ways that expanded the government's control over online content, while relegating citizen rights.
MeitY Secretary S Krishnan has defended the IT rules and the proposed changes, asserting they align with the law and the Constitution. He emphasized that a common framework is necessary to regulate news content shared by both news publishers and ordinary citizens. The discourse around this initiative continues to evoke strong reactions from various sectors, highlighting the delicate balance between regulation, freedom of expression, and national security.
Experts say this will potentially give the government more power over news-related posts shared by ordinary users, including independent journalists and podcasters. The government has proposed requiring social media platforms to follow orders and guidelines if they want to keep 'safe harbour' protection - legal immunity from liability for content posted by users.
The proposed amendments have alarmed digital rights activists and independent news creators, who say they could enforce near-total compliance with state-led censorship on social media platforms. They also warn the rules could be misused to target critics and clamp down on dissent.
The government says the amendments will strengthen existing IT rules and curb fake news, hate speech, and deepfakes, and has invited public feedback by 14 April. But critics remain sceptical of the government's stated intentions. Akash Banerjee, who runs the YouTube channel The Deshbhakt with more than six million subscribers, says the rules could create a climate of fear, pushing many creators toward self-censorship.
Interestingly, despite the many laws regulating online content, hate speech and fake news haven't reduced in the country. Meanwhile, posts that are critical of the government - even if they're satirical - are increasingly being blocked or removed, according to Banerjee.
But last month, X blocked about a dozen accounts, many known for satirical posts about the government, acting on orders issued under Section 69A of India's IT Act. Kumar Nayan, whose X account @Nehr_who? has about 242,000 followers, told the BBC he received neither prior notice nor an explanation for the block. He noted that while he managed to restore his account through a court order, several of his posts critical of the government were still blocked pending review.
Digital rights activist Nikhil Pahwa warns that the proposed amendments to the IT rules only enhance the government's infrastructure for mass censorship, reducing user rights further. The IT rules have previously been amended in ways that expanded the government's control over online content, while relegating citizen rights.
MeitY Secretary S Krishnan has defended the IT rules and the proposed changes, asserting they align with the law and the Constitution. He emphasized that a common framework is necessary to regulate news content shared by both news publishers and ordinary citizens. The discourse around this initiative continues to evoke strong reactions from various sectors, highlighting the delicate balance between regulation, freedom of expression, and national security.
