The court delivered a decisive ruling, awarding Lattouf A$70,000 in damages, while emphasizing the pressures surrounding her dismissal, including claims of external lobbying from pro-Israel groups. In the aftermath of this highly publicized case, questions were raised about the broadcaster's commitment to safeguarding diverse voices and its adherence to free speech, particularly for those holding minority backgrounds. Lattouf, known for her activism and commentary on issues such as racism, stated that the incident had severely impacted her reputation.

After complaints about Lattouf reached the upper management of the ABC, she alleged that external pressures influenced the broadcaster's decision. Despite the ABC's argument that they merely shortened her contract and did not dismiss her, Justice Darryl Rangiah acknowledged that racial factors did not play a part in her firing. However, the ruling emphasized the importance of protecting journalistic integrity and independence amidst external pressures, reinforcing Lattouf's stance as a vocal advocate for rights and representation.

The case has sparked widespread dialogue about the role of media organizations in upholding freedom of expression, particularly in politically sensitive situations. The scandal surrounding Lattouf's dismissal has become emblematic of larger discussions regarding editorial independence and the responsibilities of public broadcasters to support their diverse staff.