Australia's Bold Move Against Social Media: The Under-16 Ban

Sat Dec 20 2025 13:55:17 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

Australia has embarked on a groundbreaking initiative to ban social media accounts for users under 16. This decision has elicited varied reactions from tech companies and experts, raising questions about children's safety and the influence of social platforms.

Australia's new law banning social media accounts for users under 16 is the first of its kind and has led to significant backlash from tech companies. Critics argue that the ban undermines children's rights and could inadvertently make them more vulnerable. Various stakeholders are watching to see if this regulatory move may inspire similar actions globally, as Australia aims to protect younger users from the potential harms of social media.

When Stephen Scheeler became Facebook's Australia chief in the early 2010s, he was a true believer in the power of the internet and social media for public good.

But by 2017, when he left, doubts had crept in regarding social media's impact on mental health, particularly among teenagers. Criticism of social media platforms has reached a fever pitch, leading several countries, including Australia, to consider significant regulations.

Australia's bold new initiative introduces a ban on social media for users under 16, positioning the country as a leader in safeguarding children's online interactions. This move has drawn protests from major tech companies, who argue that such a blanket ban could hinder children's rights and their ability to navigate online spaces effectively.

Key voices from the tech industry have been publicly vocal in their dissent. They argue that this legislation may misguide children rather than protect them, as tighter restrictions could foster ignorance rather than informed digital citizenship. Paul Taske from NetChoice has termed it 'blanket censorship,' claiming it could render youth less informed and connected.

While this action positions Australia at the forefront of tech regulation, it raises the specter of imitation by other countries. Experts warn that this ban may inspire peers and allies to follow suit—an outcome that could create a ripple effect worldwide.

In the face of mounting scrutiny, social media firms have argued for more nuanced approaches, emphasizing parental agency in monitoring children’s online engagement rather than imposing government regulations. Their lobbying efforts have included meetings with government officials and campaigns aimed at promoting safer versions of their products for younger audiences.

As the new law takes shape, it underscores a broader conversation about user safety, corporate responsibility, and the urgent need for effective solutions to protect vulnerable populations from potential online harms.