Skip to main content
FlashPoint News
PoliticsWashington, D.C., United States

Supreme Court Green‑Lights Trump’s $400 M White House Ballroom Project

In a 5‑4 decision the high court cleared construction of a new ballroom and helipad behind the White House, a win for President Trump that defied historic preservation groups.

Source: bbc.co.uk1 min read
Supreme Court Green‑Lights Trump’s $400 M White House Ballroom Project
Image via bbc.co.uk

In brief

The U.S. Supreme Court granted President Donald Trump’s emergency request to build a new ballroom at the White House, allowing construction to proceed. In a narrow 5‑4 ruling, the justices overrode a lower court’s order that would have halted the project. Chief Justice John Roberts dissented, arguing the construction may violate congressional approval requirements. The case was brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which insists the president cannot unilaterally demolish historic structures. Trump celebrated the decision as a “golden age” milestone for the nation.

Supreme Court clears way for Trump to keep building White House ballroom.

In a 5‑4 decision the high court granted the President’s emergency request, allowing the $400 million ($400m) ballroom on the East Wing to continue. The ruling overrode lower court orders that had halted construction of the above‑ground portion of the building.

Chief Justice John Roberts, alongside three liberal justices, dissented, contending that construction might be unlawful because Congress had not approved the project. In the dissenter’s view the plaintiffs, represented by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, had standing to challenge the decision.

Trump said he was “pleased” the suit was dismissed, calling the building “one of the greatest ever constructed in Washington, D.C.” He has long argued the White House needs a larger events space for security and ceremonial purposes.
The request follows the president’s demolition of the historic East Wing last autumn to begin construction of the ballroom and a new helipad on the South Lawn.

The National Trust stressed that the President cannot unilaterally re‑design or demolish a historic landmark without congressional approval, a view endorsed by the dissenting majority of the justices.

The court also noted the plaintiffs faced “irreparable harm” if the construction remained halted, and the decision did not decide the legality of the project outright.

Trump’s wider agenda includes renovating the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, proposing an “Arc de Trump” bigger than Paris’s Arc de Triomphe, and other cityscape alterations nationwide.

Topics

More on this story