NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Recent judicial developments in the criminal case against Kilmar Abrego Garcia reveal that officials from the Justice Department considered his indictment a 'top priority' after he was mistakenly deported and later ordered back to the U.S. Garcia, who has pleaded not guilty to charges of human smuggling in a Tennessee federal court, is seeking to dismiss the case, claiming it serves as a form of punishment from the Trump administration following his wrongful deportation.
To bolster his claim, Garcia is demanding that the government disclose documents outlining the prosecution's decision, which occurred in 2025 for an incident dating almost three years prior. On December 3, U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw issued a sealed order requiring the government to provide some pertinent documents, later unsealed to shed light on the case.
Judge Crenshaw previously noted 'some evidence' suggesting that the prosecution could be vindictive, highlighting a statement by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Fox News, implying that the prosecution was initiated due to Garcia winning his wrongful deportation case.
Rob McGuire, the former Acting U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee, contended that such statements bear no relevance since he made the decision to prosecute independently and holds no personal grievances against Garcia.
To bolster his claim, Garcia is demanding that the government disclose documents outlining the prosecution's decision, which occurred in 2025 for an incident dating almost three years prior. On December 3, U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw issued a sealed order requiring the government to provide some pertinent documents, later unsealed to shed light on the case.
Judge Crenshaw previously noted 'some evidence' suggesting that the prosecution could be vindictive, highlighting a statement by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Fox News, implying that the prosecution was initiated due to Garcia winning his wrongful deportation case.
Rob McGuire, the former Acting U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee, contended that such statements bear no relevance since he made the decision to prosecute independently and holds no personal grievances against Garcia.
