Skip to main content
FlashPoint News
PoliticsEastern Europe

Moscow stays silent while Trump vows energy ceasefire

US President Donald Trump announced an immediate ceasefire on strikes to energy infrastructure, while Moscow has yet to comment.

Source: bbc.co.uk1 min read
Workers restore power after strike
Workers restore power after strike (Workers at a Ukrainian power station look to restore supply after a missile strike.)

In brief

On 12 October 2026 Trump announced an immediate ceasefire on attacks to energy infrastructure in the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. While Ukrainian leaders welcomed the pledge, Moscow has remained quiet, with spokesman Dmitry Peskov noting that contacts were ongoing but giving no official statement. Pro‑Kremlin outlets praised the move as a surprising win for Moscow, arguing it limits Ukrainian strikes while allowing Russia to maintain its own operations. Analysts warn that the ceasefire could be one‑way, offering Ukraine a breather but not alleviating Russian pressure on its energy supply. The silence from Moscow underscores a complex diplomatic dance amid the war’s continued intensity.

On 12 October 2026 the United States announced a renewed energy ceasefire in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, declaring that it had reached a deal to halt strikes on energy infrastructure. The announcement was made live by President Donald Trump, who said the ceasefire was effective immediately.

While Ukrainian officials, including President Volodymyr Zelensky, welcomed the pledge as a step toward protecting civilians, the Kremlin has yet to issue an official comment. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov replied to a journalist’s question that “contacts are continuing” and that an update will follow when available.

Pro‑Kremlin media outlets have praised Trump’s announcement, calling it a surprise win for Moscow. They argue the ceasefire limits Ukrainian attacks on Russian energy facilities while allowing Russia to keep its own operations running unchanged. This interpretation paints the deal as largely one‑sided in favour of Moscow.

Analysts warn that the ceasefire could be conditional and that Moscow may still target Ukrainian energy infrastructure while tightening pressure on its own supply lines, especially as the winter campaign gathers momentum. The lack of a clear Russian statement fuels uncertainty about the deal’s enforceability and whether it reflects genuine diplomatic progress or merely a tactical pause.

In the wider context, the ceasefire coincides with a US‑Russia fuel agreement that imports Russian diesel into the United States. Trump claims the deal will benefit American consumers, though critics note the volume may be insufficient to lower fuel prices significantly.

The Kremlin’s silence, combined with its continued drone attacks on Ukrainian energy assets, suggests that Moscow remains committed to a strategy that aims to undermine Kiev while preserving its own war effort.

Topics

More on this story