Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Results in Mistrial as Jury Deadlocks

Mon Jun 01 2026 08:54:02 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

In a significant development for the #MeToo movement, the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in Harvey Weinstein's rape retrial, leading to a mistrial. The case may be retried as prosecutors assess their options.

The jury in Harvey Weinstein's rape retrial declared themselves deadlocked, resulting in a mistrial. This marks the third trial regarding the accusations against the disgraced Hollywood mogul, with a potential fourth trial being considered by prosecutors. While Weinstein's defense claimed the encounter was consensual, the accuser, Jessica Mann, insists she deserves justice. The Manhattan District Attorney's office praised Mann's bravery as they decide on the next steps.

NEW YORK (FlashPoint) — Harvey Weinstein's rape retrial ended in a mistrial on Friday after the jury could not come to a unanimous decision. This complex case related to the #MeToo movement marks Weinstein's third round of legal proceedings concerning sexual assault allegations.

Despite being convicted of other sexual crimes across the United States and currently imprisoned, the unresolved New York charge leaves questions regarding its future as prosecutors consider a potential fourth trial. The jury indicated that nine out of twelve jurors favored acquitting Weinstein, sparking discussion about next steps.

Attorney Marc Agnifilo noted that while this outcome may not be a complete victory for Weinstein, it does present an opportunity for his defense team to reassess and prepare for a retrial. Weinstein, now 74, reportedly displayed little reaction to the mistrial outcome but his legal team expressed satisfaction.

The trial aimed to determine whether Weinstein raped Jessica Mann, a 40-year-old hairstylist and actress, in 2013, with his defense arguing that their interactions were consensual. Mann claimed that Weinstein raped her during a hotel encounter in New York City, despite her repeated denials.

Juror feedback emphasized a lack of trust in Mann's testimony, with jurors indicating inconsistencies in her account. Additionally, some jurors considered her emotional attachment and ongoing communication with Weinstein post-incident as complicating factors in deliberations.

Mann, in her statement, reinforced her commitment to seeking justice. District Attorney Alvin Bragg celebrated her bravery and confirmed that they would consult her on the next steps in the case, which is slated for reevaluation next month.

The path to this trial has been tumultuous; Weinstein's previous convictions were overturned and various appeals have led to ongoing courtroom battles. The accusations against Weinstein led to an awakening in the entertainment industry regarding sexual misconduct, solidifying the #MeToo movement's presence.

While Weinstein's lawyers have claimed that Mann is attempting to distort a mutual relationship into a narrative of assault, Mann's assertion remains firm as she continues to advocate for her truth in the face of societal scrutiny.