Skip to main content
FlashPoint News
PoliticsA federal judge in Boston is set to consider a motion requiring the Trump administration to continue funding the SNAP food aid program despite the government shutdown, as Democratic officials argue the administration has a legal obligation to keep it operating.

Federal Judge to Decide on Funding SNAP During Government Shutdown

A federal judge in Boston is set to hear legal arguments regarding the Trump administration's potential suspension of funding for the SNAP food aid program amidst the government shutdown. The decision affects millions of Americans reliant on food assistance.

Source: AP1 min read
Federal Judge to Decide on Funding SNAP During Government Shutdown
Image via AP

In brief

As the government shutdown looms, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani will consider a motion requiring the Trump administration to maintain funding for the SNAP program. The USDA has announced a halt to payments, impacting 41 million recipients across the country. Democratic leaders from 25 states argue that the administration has a legal duty to keep the program running, suggesting available contingency funds could be utilized.

BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge in Boston will review a motion today that demands the Trump administration to continue funding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) amid the government shutdown.

The upcoming hearing in front of U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani comes as the USDA plans to freeze SNAP payments, claiming they cannot sustain the program due to the shutdown.

This program is crucial, serving approximately one in eight Americans, and is a significant part of the nation's social safety net. News about the program's funding being at risk starting November 1 has triggered concern among states, food banks, and SNAP beneficiaries. Some states are reportedly considering using their own funds to maintain some aspects of the program.

A coalition of attorneys general and governors from 25 Democratic states, along with the District of Columbia, are challenging the plan to pause funding, arguing the administration has a legal obligation to sustain SNAP. They highlight the existence of contingency funds to continue its operation.

The Trump administration has stated it is legally unable to tap into an existing $5 billion contingency fund for the program, despite earlier USDA statements indicating the funds would be used to ensure SNAP continues. The Democratic coalition counters that these funds can and should be utilized, citing an additional separate fund containing approximately $23 billion available for SNAP.

The situation is critical, as the program costs around $8 billion monthly. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, as it may take one to two weeks for the reactivation of debit cards that beneficiaries use for grocery purchases.

In 2022, SNAP assisted about 41 million individuals, with nearly two-thirds of recipients being families with children, making the outcome of this hearing particularly impactful for many American families.

Topics

More on this story