In the aftermath of the tragic crash of Air India Flight 171 in June, which claimed 260 lives, the preliminary investigation report has stirred public and media speculation rather than providing closure. The document revealed that both fuel-control switches on the Boeing 787 turned to "cut-off" just after takeoff, resulting in a total loss of power – a situation typically reserved for landing. The key moment recorded in the cockpit conveyed one pilot questioning the other's action of "cutting-off," to which the latter denied any involvement, leaving confusion about accountability.
As the co-pilot was piloting the aircraft while the captain monitored, their extensive flight experience raised additional concerns. Both pilots had completed health checks successfully before the ill-fated flight. Since the report’s release, various theories, notably suggesting senior pilot involvement, have circulated, particularly reported by outlets like The Wall Street Journal and Reuters. The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) urged caution against speculations, emphasizing that premature conclusions could mislead and obstruct ongoing investigations.
Furthermore, Jennifer Homendy, NTSB chairwoman involved in the inquiry, criticized speculative media coverage. Indian pilots have also condemned the rush to blame the crew, characterizing it as irresponsible and dismissing the calls for caution as inappropriate. As the investigation continues, there are multiple angles under scrutiny, including the possibility of mechanical glitches as suggested by unnamed accident investigators, while maintaining that any activation of the fuel switches would require careful examination of some cockpit dialogue.
The AAIB's primary focus involves identifying the root causes, stating that any conclusions drawn so far must be approached with caution. They hinted at a potential upcoming reveal of crucial voice recorder transcripts that would clarify the confusing cockpit conversation. Despite various speculations about electrical fires or pilot error contributing to the calamity, the consensus rests on the confirmed fact that both fuel switches were moved to "cut-off" before the tragedy unfolded.
Investigators and aviation experts stress the importance of refraining from speculating about intent until all facts are thoroughly established. As the investigation remains ongoing, the final report is anticipated to deliver crucial findings as to what led to this disastrous event. With uncertainty looming, the aviation community and the public await further developments that could shed light on this tragic incident.
