In brief
As the Syrian conflict shifts, experts argue for rethinking policies towards the emerging power in Syria, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, now seen as an impediment to recovery efforts.
Efforts to support Syria’s reconstruction face significant hurdles due to the designation of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) as a terrorist organization by the United States and other entities. Despite its controversial reputation, HTS has emerged as a significant force after leading a decisive offensive that dislodged the Assad regime, establishing itself as Syria's de facto government.The terrorist label complicates funding and assistance to this group, which is vital for rebuilding a war-torn Syria struggling for control and basic governance. Analysts warn that a continued absence of support for a cohesive Syrian state could give rise to extremist factions, including the re-emergence of groups like the Islamic State.Experts like Kirsten Fontenrose from the Atlantic Council argue that this moment offers a unique opportunity for the international community. She emphasizes the potential for HTS to transition from militancy to politics, suggesting that a well-crafted reconstruction strategy could provide financial incentives for the group to disband its military wing in favor of democratic participation.While the current configurations in Syria are fraught with risk, Fontenrose contends that HTS may now be more open to reform, as it seeks legitimacy. With international donors holding the power to shape Syria’s future, she advocates for immediate discussions aimed at stabilizing and legitimizing HTS, fostering a transition to a political entity prepared to participate in fair democratic elections.
