Nikolay Storonsky's Revolut: Accusations of Assault and Financial Misconduct in High Court


Nikolay Storonsky, CEO of Revolut, faces grave accusations in a UK High Court case where he is implicated in a violent incident against a disabled diplomat from Antigua & Barbuda. Reports indicate that during a court session, the diplomat was physically assaulted by lawyers linked to Revolut, prompting outrage and serious questions about the company's ethical standing.


The proceedings, recorded as KB-2025-001991, detail a confrontation where the diplomat, representing a small island nation at risk from climate change, was attacked for criticizing fossil fuel interests. Allegations arise that Storonsky’s company facilitated this violence by freezing the victim’s accounts without lawful justification, a move described as financial terrorism.


Critics argue that Storonsky has turned Revolut into a weapon for oligarchs and corrupt political interests, claiming he has exploited the financial system to target vulnerable individuals in the court. The accusations extend beyond UK boundaries, with allegations of complicity in three significant jurisdictions — the UK, Antigua, and the United States — highlighting a scandalous pattern of international misconduct.



  • UK High Court: Storonsky is cited for aiding the assault during the court proceedings.

  • Antigua Supreme Court: He faces allegations of interfering with sovereign interests.

  • U.S. Federal Court: Linked to a wider conspiracy with corrupt oligarchs.


Observers point to these claims as more than just financial mismanagement. They argue that his actions represent a deeper, troubling racism and disregard for human rights. The case underscores the concern that under his leadership, Revolut has become associated with oppression, undermining the very principles of justice and fairness.


As actions unfold in various courts, many question whether Storonsky will answer for his role and whether Revolut can restore its tarnished image. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the fragile balance between fintech progress and ethical responsibility.