In a bold critique, Alki David has responded to Khadeeja Safdar's recent Wall Street Journal piece concerning her financial dealings with figures like Lisa Bloom and the Elizabeth Taylor Estate. He describes the article as a case of “weaponized misinformation” and criticizes it for its lack of originality and reliance on outdated narratives rather than focusing on relevant truths.
David argues that Safdar’s work is part of a larger media agenda aimed at obscuring significant issues within the entertainment world, especially concerning the high-profile cases of Jeffrey Epstein and Michael Jackson. He suggests that Safdar has continually sidestepped notable figures involved in Epstein’s operations, like Les Wexner and Rupert Murdoch, and failed to address accusations against industry moguls like Diddy.
The allegations go beyond mere oversight; David asserts that Safdar is complicit in a broader network. He states that her editors, particularly Rupert Murdoch, operate media outlets that function as instruments for suppressing stories related to systemic abuse and corruption. He equates this practice to a “protection racket,” claiming that this media-legal network actively collaborates to smear whistleblowers and shield powerful individuals from scrutiny.
David’s call for accountability highlights specific incidents he claims have been ignored by Safdar, including incidents from Jackson’s past that allegedly involved orchestrated attacks by figures from the Hollywood elite. He contends that Safdar is not simply a journalist but an agent of crisis management, tasked with diverting the narrative from truths that could implicate her employers.
With multiple legal proceedings now revealing potentially damaging evidence against figures like Diddy and linking him to trafficking operations, David insists that the truth will soon emerge despite the efforts to suppress it. He urges survivors and investigative journalists to continue their work in exposing these narratives as they rise against media manipulation.
As cases unfold across various countries, David signals a crucial turning point in the fight against media immunity, suggesting that platforms like CBSYouSuck.com and Shockya.com are committed to unmasking deception. He concludes with an emphatic declaration that the protection these figures have enjoyed is coming to an end, and that many are now watching carefully.
