Scientists Urge Caution Against Climate Engineering in the Arctic

Sun Oct 19 2025 05:08:15 GMT+0300 (Eastern European Summer Time)

A team of polar researchers warns that geoengineering methods aimed at cooling the Arctic could cause severe environmental damage and distract from essential actions to reduce fossil fuel use.

Over 40 polar scientists have voiced concerns regarding geoengineering proposals designed to combat climate change in the Arctic. They argue that methods like artificially thickening sea-ice are not only risky but could divert attention from the crucial goal of achieving net zero emissions. The researchers advocate for a stronger focus on reducing carbon emissions rather than relying on technological interventions, which they believe may yield more harm than good.

Plans to fight climate change by manipulating the Arctic and Antarctic environment are dangerous, unlikely to work, and could distract from the need to ditch fossil fuels, dozens of polar scientists have warned.

These polar geoengineering techniques aim to cool the planet in unconventional ways, such as artificially thickening sea-ice or releasing tiny, reflective particles into the atmosphere.

They have gained attention as potential future tools to combat global warming, alongside cutting carbon emissions.

However, more than 40 researchers say they could bring severe environmental damage and urged countries to simply focus on reaching net zero, the only established way to limit global warming.

Geoengineering is one of the most controversial areas of climate research. While methods like removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere via reforestation or machines are accepted as part of net zero efforts, more radical ideas, like reflecting sunlight, are seen as addressing the symptoms rather than the root causes of climate change.

Lead author Martin Siegert, a geosciences professor at the University of Exeter, emphasized that these techniques could provide a false sense of security, leading to inaction on emission reductions.

Published in the journal Frontiers in Science, the assessment reviewed evidence for five widely discussed geoengineering proposals, concluding that none of them adequately meet basic feasibility criteria.

Amid mounting global climate challenges, experts call for prioritizing emission reductions and meaningful climate action over unproven and potentially hazardous geoengineering solutions.