Attorney General’s Office Plus – Key Exchange Summary
January 16, 2026 | Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court 9.00 AM AGT
Justice Rene Williams presiding
Judge Williams seized the case by valid issuance, acceptance of jurisdiction, and active case management, retaining jurisdiction despite parallel foreign actions.
During the hearing, clarification was sought regarding recent written submissions on the issue of jurisdiction, notably from the Attorney General’s Office – Antigua & Barbuda.
Justice Williams noted only recently receiving submissions from Mr. David and acknowledged that the AG’s Counsel had yet to review specific documents in detail.
Mr. David clarified that his recent filings included:
- Service receipts
- A note to the Court addressing comity between parallel proceedings in California and London
- Re-filed documents per the clerk’s suggestion.
The AG’s provisional view emphasized that the Court lacked jurisdiction, citing that many defendants reside outside Antigua, the claims lack clear anticipation under Antiguan law, and the alleged harm mostly occurred elsewhere.
Justice Williams acknowledged limited physical presence among defendants but expressed willingness to examine Mr. David's arguments. Mr. David stressed that jurisdiction should consider the local harm caused and pointed out the involvement of foreign entities targeting Antiguan interests.
The Judge also raised concerns about potential conflicting rulings across jurisdictions. Mr. David insisted that Antigua is the suitable venue, as it's not encumbered by the alleged misconduct.
Furthermore, the court received a letter from UK law firm Howard Kennedy, which denied the jurisdiction of the Antiguan court and stated their non-participation in the proceedings.
Mr. David claimed Howard Kennedy's non-participation constituted contempt, demanding acknowledgment of their legal service.
Justice Williams will review all submissions carefully and a written ruling on jurisdiction is expected early next month.
