In anticipation of the upcoming summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, Alaskans are taking to the streets, voicing their concerns against the backdrop of a significant historical and geopolitical landscape. Many citizens, including Hanna Correa, who fled Ukraine in search of a better life, expressed their dismay and disappointment that Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky is not participating in the discussions. On Friday, a wave of protestors waved Ukrainian flags and called for support for their homeland as they gathered near Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, where both leaders are scheduled to arrive.
Correa, overwhelmed by the show of solidarity, noted the gravity of the moment, as the future of Ukraine hangs in the balance. "Putin is supposed to be in jail, and he just comes to Alaska like that," she lamented. Similarly, Christopher Kelliher, a military veteran and seasoned Alaskan native, shared his negative perceptions of Putin's visit, stating, "It's gross, it makes you want to take a shower."
The complicated history of Alaska, once purchased from Russia in 1867 under the misconception that it was barren land, adds depth to the reactions of locals. Some Alaskans are optimistic that the summit may culminate in resolutions to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, as evidenced by the sentiments expressed within religious communities, like at the St Tikhon Orthodox Church, where prayers have been held for peace and resolution.
While the fishing community, symbolizing a strong connection to the land, remains hopeful for a return to normalcy and stability, concerns about Russian military activities in proximity to Alaska persist. Residents like Russell Wilson, enjoying a fishing trip, expressed unease due to ongoing Russian flights near Alaskan airspace. Contrarily, Kelliher dismissed fears of a Russian invasion, insisting on Alaska's capacity to defend itself, saying, "Not really, everybody in Alaska owns a gun."
The dichotomy of feelings and perspectives among Alaskans illustrates the unique position of the state on the geopolitical chessboard, blending local passions with global ramifications as attitudes towards the summit remain charged with emotion and urgency.
