Earlier this month, a Palestinian diplomat called Husam Zomlot was invited to a discussion at the Chatham House think tank in London.

Belgium had just joined the UK, France, and other countries in promising to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations in New York. And Dr. Zomlot was clear that this was a significant moment.

Weeks on, that has now come to pass. The UK, Canada, and Australia, who are all traditionally strong allies of Israel, have now taken this step.

Sir Keir Starmer announced the UK's move in a video posted on social media, stating: In the face of the growing horror in the Middle East, we are acting to keep alive the possibility of peace and of a two-state solution.

However, the question arises: who would lead a recognized Palestinian state? There are complicated geopolitical and internal dynamics at play.

For over 75 years, the Palestinian territories have faced fragmentation and disintegration, especially after the events of 1967 and the rise of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority's fragmentation between Fatah and Hamas.

Despite receiving recognition from over 150 countries, the Palestinian territories still lack a cohesive government. The 1933 Montevideo Convention states four criteria for statehood, of which Palestine meets only two: a permanent population and the capacity to enter into international relations. However, it struggles to meet the criteria of defined territory and a functioning government.

These challenges are compounded by the conflict that erupted in October 2023, which has severely affected the population of Gaza, leaving the Palestinian Authority as a largely ineffective entity. Palestinian politics has become stagnant, with calls from citizens for a new leadership echoing as Abbas nears his 90th birthday.

The internal strife has led to a climate where many Palestinians feel disillusioned and without viable leadership. Polls suggest a preference for incarcerated leader Marwan Barghouti, highlighting a significant disconnect between the existing leadership and the citizens’ aspirations.

As the landscape shifts with recent international recognition of statehood, the question about who would effectively lead Palestine remains, the world watches intently as the existing Palestinian leadership appears unable to unify or provide direction amidst ongoing strife.

In conclusion, while the recognition of Palestinian statehood marks a critical juncture, the path forward is filled with uncertainty regarding governance and internal unity. Observers are keen to see what tangible outcomes these acknowledgment efforts may yield, given the deep-rooted challenges faced by the Palestinian populace and its leadership.