The election process began on a tense note, as cardinals gathered in the Sistine Chapel, feeling fatigued and eager for resolution. Initial discussions stretched late into the evening and ended with no definitive leader emerging. Dominating the discourse were three prominent figures: Cardinal Pietro Parolin of Italy, who was initially the frontrunner due to his past experience, faced unexpected resistance as many were disillusioned with his approach. Cardinal Peter Erdo from Hungary, backed by conservative factions, struggled to rally support among a church electorate influenced by the more progressive stance of Pope Francis.

As conversations resumed in the Casa Santa Marta guesthouse, where the cardinals remained isolated from the outside world without access to phones, they began reassessing their candidates. On one side of the dinner table, Cardinal Parolin’s lack of emphasis on inclusive governance made him a contentious choice, while Cardinal Erdo's backing by conservative groups failed to gain traction. In contrast, Cardinal Prevost, often viewed as a quieter presence, began gaining traction amongst undecided members, marking a pivotal shift in the conclave's atmosphere.

This conclave has set a precedent for future papal elections, showcasing the influence of a diverse electorate and the potential for lesser-known figures to ascend to the papacy, ultimately culminating in the surprising elevation of Cardinal Prevost to Pope Leo XIV. With his election, the cardinal represents not just a leadership change but also a significant moment reflecting the evolving nature of the Catholic Church today.