A judge has again told the deadlocked jury in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial to keep trying to reach a verdict after a dramatic sixth day of deliberations in a case that has gripped America.
Tensions flared in court when the jury forewoman sent the judge a note saying one juror would not follow the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt.
The defence team asked that the juror be removed, a request that was denied, bringing audible shocks throughout the room.
Clancy, 36, faces three counts of first‑degree murder for the deaths of her three children in January 2023. While the prosecution treats the case as a straightforward murder trial, her lawyer argues a postpartum psychosis diagnosis made it difficult for her to distinguish right from wrong.
The jury of nine women and three men in Plymouth has deliberated for almost 35 hours without a verdict, following nearly six weeks of trial proceedings.
The panel has previously sent the judge notes that it could not reach a unanimous decision, but today the tension in the room was noticeably higher.
In a brief exchange, the judge reminded jurors that unanimity on guilt beyond reasonable doubt is required, and that he would not side with either side of the deliberations.
If the jury does not reach a verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial, allowing prosecutors to decide whether to retry the case. Clancy faces life in prison without parole if convicted, or psychiatric commitment if found not guilty due to lack of criminal responsibility.
Follow the case for further updates on the jury’s next deliberation round this Friday.
